首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Biapenem versus meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    9cc03443-3766-4602-9855-c1c4c189ba4f
  • 作者:
    Wang, Xiaohui#[1,2]Zhang, Xiaoke[1];Zong, Zhiyong[2];Yu, Rujia[2];Lv, Xiaoju*[1,2]Xin, Jianbao[3];Tong, Chaohui[4];Hao, Qinglin[5];Qin, Zhiqiang[6];Xiong, Ying[7];Liu, Hong[8];Ding, Guohua[9];Hu, Chengping[10];
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH ISSN:0971-5916 2013 年 138 卷 (995 - 1002) ; DEC
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    Background & objectives: Biapenem is a newly developed carbapenem to treat moderate and severe bacterial infections. This multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy, bacterial eradication rates and safety of biapenem and meropenem in the treatment of bacterial lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections (UTIs) at nine centres in China.
    Methods: Patients diagnosed with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections or UTIs were randomly assigned to receive either biapenem (300 mg every 12 h) or meropenem (500 mg every 8 h) by intravenous infusion for 7 to 14 days according to their disease severity. The overall clinical efficacy, bacterial eradication rates and drug-related adverse reactions of biapenem and meropenem were analyzed.
    Results: A total of 272 enrolled cases were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and safety analysis. There were no differences in demographics and baseline medical characteristics between biapenem group and meropenem group. The overall clinical efficacies of biapenem and meropenem were not significantly different, 94.70 per cent (125/132) vs. 93.94 per cent (124/132). The overall bacterial eradication rates of biapenem and meropenem showed no significant difference, 96.39 per cent (80/83) vs. 93.75 per cent (75/80). Drug-related adverse reactions were comparable in biapenem and meropenem groups with the incidence of 11.76 per cent (16/136) and 15.44 per cent (21/136), respectively. The most common symptoms of biapenem-related adverse reactions were rash (2.2%) and gastrointestinal distress (1.5%).
    Interpretation & conclusions: Biapenem was non-inferior to meropenem and was well-tolerated in the treatment of moderate and severe lower respiratory tract infections and UTIs.

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Wang Xiaohui,Zhang Xiaoke,Zong Zhiyong, et al. Biapenem versus meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial [J].INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH,2013,138:995-1002.
  • APA:
    Wang Xiaohui,Zhang Xiaoke,Zong Zhiyong,Yu Rujia,&Hu Chengping.(2013).Biapenem versus meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial .INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH,138:995-1002.
  • MLA:
    Wang Xiaohui, et al. "Biapenem versus meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial" .INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 138(2013):995-1002.
  • 条目包含文件:
    文件类型:PDF,文件大小:
    正在加载全文
浏览次数:65 下载次数:0
浏览次数:65
下载次数:0
打印次数:0
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部