首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    31DB26D7A13F9A5BF6E5CD58FF308DA3
  • 作者:
    Peng, Li(彭莉)#[1]Ma, Weijie#[1]Zhong, Lei#[1]Yang, Jiaru[1];Wu, Hanxin[1];Zhu, Liangyu[1];Huang, Xun[1];Yang, Rui[1];Li, Bingxue(李冰雪)[1]Ma, Weijiang[1];Wu, Xinya[1];Song, Jieqin[1];Luo, Suyi(罗夙医)[1]Bao, Fukai(宝福凯)*[1,2,3]Liu, Aihua(柳爱华)*[1,3]
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    PATHOGENS ISSN:2076-0817 2024 年 13 卷 12 期 ; DEC
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IGRA, TST, and TBST by combining diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) to increase the reliability and accuracy of diagnostic methods and promote the eradication of TB. An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted, from the date of establishment to September 30, 2024. Data were synthesized with frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses, a single-group rate meta-analysis algorithm, and a bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression model. Summarized receiver operating characteristic curves and Fagan nomograms were used to assess diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Deeks'' funnel plots and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tools were used to assess publication bias and risk of bias. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analyses. Forty-nine studies were identified. The diagnostic performance of the three diagnostic methods for TB infection is summarized as follows: the pooled sensitivity was 77.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.856), and the pooled specificity was 80.3% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86). The sensitivity and specificity of the IGRA were 82.1% (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) and 81.1% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86), respectively, both higher than the TST. However, the TBST exhibited the highest specificity, at 98.5% (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), with a sensitivity of 78.7% (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), which was between that of the IGRA and TST. Subgroup analysis found that population categories and reference standards, among other factors, may be attributed to heterogeneity. In addition, the TST and IGRA add-on TBST can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. In our study, the IGRA showed higher sensitivity, whereas the TBST showed higher specificity. Interestingly, under certain conditions, TST add-on TBST and IGRA add-on TBST showed better accuracy than TST and IGRA alone and could provide more effective guidance for clinical practice (PROSPERO CRD42023420136).

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Peng Li,Ma Weijie,Zhong Lei, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis [J].PATHOGENS,2024,13(12).
  • APA:
    Peng Li,Ma Weijie,Zhong Lei,Yang Jiaru,&Liu Aihua.(2024).Diagnostic Accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis .PATHOGENS,13(12).
  • MLA:
    Peng Li, et al. "Diagnostic Accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis" .PATHOGENS 13,12(2024).
  • 入库时间:
    2025/1/7 11:52:52
  • 更新时间:
    2025/2/11 21:25:31
  • 条目包含文件:
    文件类型:PDF,文件大小:
    正在加载全文
浏览次数:25 下载次数:0
浏览次数:25
下载次数:0
打印次数:0
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部